lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 09/15] coresight: tmc: adding mode of operation for link/sinks
From
On 19 April 2016 at 07:19, Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> wrote:
> On 12/04/16 18:54, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>
>> Moving tmc_drvdata::enable to a local_t mode. That way the
>> sink interface is aware of it's orgin and the foundation for
>> mutual exclusion between the sysFS and Perf interface can be
>> laid out.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 28
>> ++++++++++++++++++-------
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 24
>> ++++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> index 7cb287ef7b9e..5908000e1ae0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static int tmc_enable_etf_sink(struct coresight_device
>> *csdev, u32 mode)
>> {
>> bool allocated = false;
>> char *buf = NULL;
>> + u32 val;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>>
>> @@ -146,6 +147,15 @@ fast_path:
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> + val = local_xchg(&drvdata->mode, mode);
>> + /*
>> + * In sysFS mode we can have multiple writers per sink. Since
>> this
>> + * sink is already enabled no memory is needed and the HW need not
>> be
>> + * touched.
>> + */
>> + if (val == CS_MODE_SYSFS)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>
>
> We are not dropping the spinlock in this case. Are we ?

Definitely - thanks for pointing that out.

>
>> /*
>> * If drvdata::buf isn't NULL, memory was allocated for a previous
>> * trace run but wasn't read. If so simply zero-out the memory.
>> @@ -163,9 +173,9 @@ fast_path:
>> }
>>
>> tmc_etb_enable_hw(drvdata);
>> - drvdata->enable = true;
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>
>> +out:
>> /* Free memory outside the spinlock if need be */
>> if (!allocated && buf)
>> kfree(buf);
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> index 6022ff26deba..8e6fe267195a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static void tmc_etr_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata
>> *drvdata)
>> static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>> {
>> bool allocated = false;
>> + u32 val;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> void __iomem *vaddr = NULL;
>> dma_addr_t paddr;
>> @@ -125,6 +126,15 @@ fast_path:
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> + val = local_xchg(&drvdata->mode, mode);
>> + /*
>> + * In sysFS mode we can have multiple writers per sink. Since
>> this
>> + * sink is already enabled no memory is needed and the HW need not
>> be
>> + * touched.
>> + */
>> + if (val == CS_MODE_SYSFS)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>
>
> Same as above, we should drop the locks in this case.
>
>> @@ -140,9 +150,9 @@ fast_path:
>> memset(drvdata->vaddr, 0, drvdata->size);
>>
>> tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata);
>> - drvdata->enable = true;
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>
>> +out:
>> /* Free memory outside the spinlock if need be */
>> if (!allocated && vaddr)
>> dma_free_coherent(drvdata->dev, drvdata->size, vaddr,
>> paddr);
>> @@ -153,6 +163,7 @@ fast_path:
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>> index 80096fa75326..821bdf150ac9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h
>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ enum tmc_mem_intf_width {
>> * @paddr: DMA start location in RAM.
>> * @vaddr: virtual representation of @paddr.
>> * @size: @buf size.
>> - * @enable: this TMC is being used.
>> + * @mode: how this TMC is being used.
>> * @config_type: TMC variant, must be of type @tmc_config_type.
>> * @trigger_cntr: amount of words to store after a trigger.
>> */
>> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct tmc_drvdata {
>> dma_addr_t paddr;
>> void __iomem *vaddr;
>> u32 size;
>> - bool enable;
>> + local_t mode;
>
>
> Since we always deal with the mode under the spinlock, do we really need
> this to
> be local_t ? Or do we plan to get rid of the lock ?

You are correct, using a local_t variable isn't strictly needed here. But:

1) It greatly simplifies the code.
2) I'm really hoping one day we can do without the spinlocks, though I
don't know when that will happen.

Get back to me if you're resolute on switching the local_t to a normal type.

Mathieu

>
> Suzuki
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-19 18:01    [W:0.069 / U:1.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site