lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 06/15] coresight: tmc: making prepare/unprepare functions generic
From
On 19 April 2016 at 06:30, Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> wrote:
> On 12/04/16 18:54, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>
>> Dealing with HW related matters in tmc_read_prepare/unprepare
>> becomes convoluted when many cases need to be handled distinctively.
>>
>> As such moving processing related to HW setup to individual driver
>> files and keep the core driver generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 62
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c | 55
>> +++++-----------------
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h | 8 ++--
>> 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> index 910d6f3b7d26..495540e9064d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void tmc_etr_dump_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>> drvdata->buf = drvdata->vaddr;
>> }
>>
>> -void tmc_etr_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +static void tmc_etr_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>> {
>> CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>>
>> @@ -126,3 +126,43 @@ static const struct coresight_ops_sink
>> tmc_etr_sink_ops = {
>> const struct coresight_ops tmc_etr_cs_ops = {
>> .sink_ops = &tmc_etr_sink_ops,
>> };
>> +
>> +int tmc_read_prepare_etr(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + /* config types are set a boot time and never change */
>> + if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETR)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
>
> ...
>
>> +
>> +int tmc_read_unprepare_etr(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + /* config types are set a boot time and never change */
>> + if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETR)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>
>
> For both cases above should we WARN_ON_ONCE() if we encounter such a case ?

WARN_ON_ONCE() would also be valid, albeit very blunt. Those
functions are user space triggered and returning -EINVAL will stop
everything - the end result is the same. I suppose that on such
condition fighting back with a backtrace will force people to pay
attention or report the problem.

>
> Irrespective of that,
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-19 17:41    [W:0.059 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site