lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tpm_crb: fix mapping of the buffers
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:59:24AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:34:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:08:00AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On my Lenovo x250 the following situation occurs:
> > >
> > > [18697.813871] tpm_crb MSFT0101:00: can't request region for resource
> > > [mem 0xacdff080-0xacdfffff]
> >
> > Sigh, the BIOS vendors seem to be screwing this up a lot.. No doubt
> > because the spec doesn't really say what to do very well...
> >
> > > The mapping of the control area interleaves the mapping of the command
> > > buffer. The control area is mapped over page, which is not right. It
> > > should mapped over sizeof(struct crb_control_area).
> >
> > Good
> >
> > > Fixing this issue unmasks another issue. Command and response buffers
> > > can interleave and they do interleave on this machine.
> >
> > Do they 100% overlap because one is 'read' and the other is 'write'?
>
> 100% so it is kind of sane configuration.
>
> > Or did the BIOS guys screw up the length of one of the regions, and
> > they were supposed to be back to back? In which case it is just luck
> > this proposed patch solves the issue :(
> >
> > The request_io stuff is there specifically to prevent two peices of
> > code from trying to control the same registers, I'm really reluctant to
> > work-around it like this, though granted, crazy BIOS is a fine good reason.
> >
> > Is this patch below enough to deal with it sanely?
> >
> > If you do stick with this then:
> >
> > > -static void __iomem *crb_map_res(struct device *dev, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > - struct resource *io_res, u64 start, u32 size)
> > > +static int crb_map_res(struct device *dev, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > > + int res_i, u64 start, u32 size)
> >
> > I wouldn't change the signature at all, just add a counter to the priv and
> > 'append to the list'
> >
> > This change is creating a lot of needless churn which is not good at
> > all for the stable rules.
> >
> > Removing the pointer return is not an improvement..
>
> Point taken but then it is better to make the fix even more localized. If
> the physical addresses are equal, check the buffer sizes for sanity.
> If they are not equal, emit FW_BUG and return -EINVAL.

This is also correct way to handle the situation according to

http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/resources/pc_client_platform_tpm_profile_ptp_specification

In the table in the section 5.5.3.1 it is stated about rsp_size
that:

"Note:: If command and response buffers are implemented as a single
buffer, this field SHALL be identical to the value in the
TPM_CRB_CTRL_CMD_SIZE_x buffer."

/Jarkko

> I'll send an updated patch after I've done all testing rounds with my
> laptop and Haswell NUC.
>
> /Jarkko
>
> > > {
> > > + u8 __iomem *ptr;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > struct resource new_res = {
> > > .start = start,
> > > .end = start + size - 1,
> > > @@ -245,12 +257,25 @@ static void __iomem *crb_map_res(struct device *dev, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > >
> > > /* Detect a 64 bit address on a 32 bit system */
> > > if (start != new_res.start)
> > > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - if (!resource_contains(io_res, &new_res))
> > > - return devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &new_res);
> > > + for (i = 0; i < CRB_NR_RESOURCES; i++) {
> > > + if (resource_contains(&priv->res[i], &new_res)) {
> > > + priv->res[res_i] = new_res;
> > > + priv->res_ptr[res_i] = priv->res_ptr[i] +
> > > + (new_res.start - priv->res[i].start);
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > Just add:
> >
> > id = priv->num_res++;
> > priv->res[id] = *io_res;
> > priv->res_ptr[id] = priv->iobase + (new_res.start - io_res->start);
> > return priv->res_ptr[id];
> >
> > And drop all the other hunks, except for the sizeof change and the
> > above loop.
> >
> > Maybe print a FW bug if it overlaps with id != 0, that is just
> > crazy beans.
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > index 20155d55a62b..0a87c813d004 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> > @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > struct list_head resources;
> > struct resource io_res;
> > struct device *dev = &device->dev;
> > - u64 pa;
> > + u64 cmd_pa,rsp_pa;
> > int ret;
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resources);
> > @@ -274,22 +274,33 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> > return PTR_ERR(priv->iobase);
> >
> > priv->cca = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, buf->control_address,
> > - 0x1000);
> > + sizeof(*priv->cca));
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->cca))
> > return PTR_ERR(priv->cca);
> >
> > - pa = ((u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high) << 32) |
> > - (u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
> > - priv->cmd = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, pa,
> > - ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_size));
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd))
> > - return PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
> > -
> > + cmd_pa = ((u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high) << 32) |
> > + (u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
> > memcpy_fromio(&pa, &priv->cca->rsp_pa, 8);
> > - pa = le64_to_cpu(pa);
> > - priv->rsp = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, pa,
> > - ioread32(&priv->cca->rsp_size));
> > - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->rsp);
> > + rsp_pa = le64_to_cpu(pa);
> > +
> > + if (cmd_pa == rsp_pa) {
> > + u32 len = max_t(size_t,ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_size),
> > + ioread32(&priv->cca->rsp_size));
> > + priv->cmd = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, cmd_pa, len);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd))
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
> > + priv->rsp = priv->cmd;
> > + } else {
> > + priv->cmd = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, cmd_pa,
> > + ioread32(&priv->cca->rsp_size));
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd))
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
> > + priv->rsp = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, rsp_pa,
> > + ioread32(&priv->cca->rsp_size));
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rsp))
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->rsp);
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-19 08:21    [W:0.044 / U:5.248 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site