lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through devicetree
Hi Olliver,

On 04/19/2016 09:20 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey Jaehoon,
>
> On 19-04-16 11:49, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 04/19/2016 06:42 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>> Hi Ulf,
>>>
>>> On 19-04-16 11:29, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>> On 19 April 2016 at 09:12, Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl> wrote:
>>>>> In patch 81f8a7be66 Hans de Goede added a patch to allow marking an mmc
>>>>> device as to having an broken HPI implementation. After talking some
>>>>> with Hans, we now think it is actually the mmc controller that can be
>>>>> broken and not support broken HPI's.
>>>> I don't want us to invent a DT binding for something you *think* is a
>>>> HW controller issue.
>>>>
>>>> Have you really excluded that this isn't a software issue? Me
>>>> personally haven't been using HPI that much so I can't really tell
>>>> about the code robustness from the mmc core (mmc protocol point of
>>>> view).
>>> Well this patch goes hand in hand so to speak with the broken-hpi patch introduced by him, he did most of the investigation. We just discussed how to handle it and asked me to cook up the patch.
>> I didn't understand why add this property. Is this same patch?
>>
>> commit 81f8a7be6642b4c26ab681b2e0f4c4120a6de1b0
>> Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed Apr 1 17:26:23 2015 +0200
>>
>> mmc: Add support for marking hpi as broken through devicetree
>>
>> The eMMC on a tablet I've will stop working / communicating as soon as
>> the kernel executes:
>>
>> mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>> EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
>>
>> There seems to be no way to reliable identify eMMC-s which have a broken
>> hpi implementation, but at least for eMMC's which are soldered onto a board
>> we can work around this by specifying that hpi is broken in devicetree.
> Similar, this does it on the card level, e.g. you mark a card as having a broken HPI implementation.
>
> The truth is, the card may not be broken at all, but the mmc controller so we add a property on the controller level.
>
> What Ulf is pondering, if this is not a software stack problem, rather then a hardware implementation, which I don't know.

Hmm..problem is mmc controller side..it's strange.
How did you know this problem is on mmc controller side?

Well, i should be also missing something for HPI feature..but it's not relevant to mmc controller.

Ok. i will check more..

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

>>> @hans, what do you think?
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Uffe
>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds a new capability, mmc-broken-hpi, which allows us to
>>>>> mark a broken hpi implementation on the host level.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 ++
>>>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +-
>>>>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>>>>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>>>> index 6e4c55a..9b63b36 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>>>> @@ -270,6 +270,8 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>>>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_HW_RESET;
>>>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-sdio-irq"))
>>>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>>>>> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-broken-hpi"))
>>>>> + host->caps |= MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI;
>>>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "full-pwr-cycle"))
>>>>> host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE;
>>>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "keep-power-in-suspend"))
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>>> index 4dbe3df..9a19562 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>>> @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Enable HPI feature (if supported)
>>>>> */
>>>>> - if (card->ext_csd.hpi) {
>>>>> + if (card->ext_csd.hpi && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI)) {
>>>>> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>>>> EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
>>>>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>>>> index 8dd4d29..20f758e 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>>>> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>>>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A (1 << 23) /* Host supports Driver Type A */
>>>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_C (1 << 24) /* Host supports Driver Type C */
>>>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D (1 << 25) /* Host supports Driver Type D */
>>>>> +#define MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI (1 << 29) /* Host support for HPI is broken */
>>>>> #define MMC_CAP_CMD23 (1 << 30) /* CMD23 supported. */
>>>>> #define MMC_CAP_HW_RESET (1 << 31) /* Hardware reset */
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.8.0.rc3
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-19 15:01    [W:0.085 / U:20.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site