Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:12:17 +0530 | From | Anshuman Khandual <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm/hugetlb: Protect follow_huge_(pud|pgd) functions from race |
| |
On 04/11/2016 11:34 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 04/07/2016 03:04 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: >> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> > >> > mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'follow_huge_pud': >>>>>> >>> >> mm/hugetlb.c:4360:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'pud_page' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> > page = pud_page(*pud) + ((address & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); >> > ^ >> > mm/hugetlb.c:4360:8: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast >> > page = pud_page(*pud) + ((address & ~PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); >> > ^ >> > mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'follow_huge_pgd': >> > mm/hugetlb.c:4395:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'pgd_page' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> > page = pgd_page(*pgd) + ((address & ~PGDIR_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); > Both the build errors here are because of the fact that pgd_page() is > not available for some platforms and config options. It got missed as > I ran only powerpc config options for build test purpose. My bad, will > fix it.
The following change seems to fix the build problem on S390 but will require some inputs from S390 maintainers regarding the functional correctness of the patch.
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h index 2f66645..834a8a6 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -963,6 +963,8 @@ static inline pmd_t *pmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long address) #define pte_page(x) pfn_to_page(pte_pfn(x)) #define pmd_page(pmd) pfn_to_page(pmd_pfn(pmd)) +#define pud_page(pud) pud_val(pud) +#define pgd_page(pgd) pgd_val(pgd)
| |