Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Apr 2016 23:53:58 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: call cpufreq hook in additional paths |
| |
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 02:40:32PM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote: > On 03/31/2016 02:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:59:51AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>> > > - passing an argument into attach_entity_load_avg() to indicate > >>> > > whether calling the cpufreq hook is necessary > >>> > > > >>> > > Both of these are ugly in their own way but would avoid a runtime > >>> > > cost. Opinions welcome. > >> > > >> > Lemme see what this would look like while I throw the below into the bit > >> > bucket. > > OK, so the below looks a lot more sane; and has the surprising benefit > > of actually shrinking the text size.. > > > > 43675 1226 24 44925 af7d defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.base > > 43723 1226 24 44973 afad defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.patch > > 43595 1226 24 44845 af2d defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.patch+ > > > > --- > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > Cool, thanks. Shall I fold this into this patch and resend the series of > 3? Or would you prefer to add this change separately?
I think I've got it folded into your third patch, I haven't published the queue yet though; I'll try and sort through the stuff I have on Monday or so.
| |