lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Bug with paravirt ops and livepatches
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >
> > > Agreed; I think we should be safe applying all the alternatives (with
> > > paravirt being really just a special case of those) to the coming module
> > > at the very last phase; they really are required only during runtime,
> > > but nothing else should be depending on them. Right? If anyone is able
> > > to come up with and counter-example, please speak up :)
> >
> > So I have quickly gone through all the architectures that actually do
> > overload __weak module_finalize() by their own implementation, and except
> > for applying self-modifying code changes and registering unwind tables,
> > there doesn't seem to be any relevant heavy-lifting, that'd need to be
> > done before relocations have been written.
> >
> > Is the (completely untested) sort-of-a-patch below a complete rubbish
> > (on top of current livepatching.git's for-next)?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> > index 5f71aa6..c003648 100644
> > --- a/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -3211,7 +3211,7 @@ int __weak module_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int post_relocation(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info)
> > +static void post_relocation(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info)
> > {
> > /* Sort exception table now relocations are done. */
> > sort_extable(mod->extable, mod->extable + mod->num_exentries);
> > @@ -3222,9 +3222,6 @@ static int post_relocation(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info)
> >
> > /* Setup kallsyms-specific fields. */
> > add_kallsyms(mod, info);
> > -
> > - /* Arch-specific module finalizing. */
> > - return module_finalize(info->hdr, info->sechdrs, mod);
> > }
> >
> > /* Is this module of this name done loading? No locks held. */
> > @@ -3562,9 +3559,7 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
> > if (err < 0)
> > goto free_modinfo;
> >
> > - err = post_relocation(mod, info);
> > - if (err < 0)
> > - goto free_modinfo;
> > + post_relocation(mod, info);
> >
> > flush_module_icache(mod);
> >
> > @@ -3589,6 +3584,11 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
> > if (err)
> > goto bug_cleanup;
> >
> > + /* Arch-specific module finalizing. */
> > + err = module_finalize(info->hdr, info->sechdrs, mod);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto bug_cleanup;
>
> goto coming_cleanup;
>
> Otherwise it looks ok. I'll give it a proper look on Monday though.
>
> Miroslav

I'll test this out and see if it fixes the original issue.
--chris

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-01 18:41    [W:0.105 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site