lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] usb: gadget: f_midi: cleanups and typos fixes
Date

Hi,

Felipe Ferreri Tonello <eu@felipetonello.com> writes:
>>> On March 5, 2016 4:28:45 PM GMT+00:00, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 02 2016, Felipe F. Tonello wrote:
>>>>>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>>>>>>> * Copyright (C) 2006 Thumtronics Pty Ltd.
>>>>>>> * Ben Williamson <ben.williamson@greyinnovation.com>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> - * Licensed under the GPL-2 or later.
>>>>>>> + * Licensed under the GPLv2.
>>>>
>>>>> On March 4, 2016 7:17:31 PM GMT+00:00, Michal Nazarewicz
>>>> <mina86@mina86.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Any particular reason to do that?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 04 2016, Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
>>>>> Because the kernel is v2 only and not later.
>>>>
>>>> Linux as a whole is GPLv2 only, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that
>>>> parts of it cannot be dual licensed (or GPLv2+). It’s safer to leave
>>>> copyright noticed clear unless you explicitly want your contribution be
>>>> GPLv2 only which brings the whole file GPLv2 only.
>>>>
>>>>> I just tried to make this driver more consistent with the coding
>>>> style
>>>>> used across the kernel. That's it.
>>>>
>>>> Column alignment of field names or RHS of assignment operators is quite
>>>> inconsistent already within drivers/usb/gadget/ which is why I’m
>>>> concerned whether this is really helping.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I actually don’t care much, just adding my two rappen.
>>>
>>> Right, I am ok with Balbi completely ignoring this patch. But I prefer
>>> to have at least this driver consistent than nothing. Of course I'll
>>> remove the license change I made.
>>
>> consistent in what way ?
>
> Source-code.
>
> The goal of this patch is to update this driver coding style to promote
> consistency, readability, and maintainability based on the Linux coding
> style.
>
> If this patch does not achieving that or if that is not necessary, than
> just ignore this patch.

yeah, I don't think that's what you're doing here.

--
balbi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-08 09:21    [W:0.133 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site