Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:50:15 +0800 | From | Herbert Xu <> | Subject | Re: Question on rhashtable in worst-case scenario. |
| |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:46:45AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > In this case, I think perhaps you can just patch your local system with > the many interfaces connecting to the same AP to add the parameter > Herbert suggested (.insecure_elasticity = true in sta_rht_params). This > is, after all, very much a case that "normal" operation doesn't even > get close to.
I think you should just turn it on everywhere for mac80211. Chain length checks simply don't make sense when you allow duplicate keys in the hash table.
Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
| |