Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:24:46 +0800 | From | Yuyang Du <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Update comment after a variable rename |
| |
Suddenly realized there is another one not updated. Sorry.
--- Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Update comment after a variable rename
Commit ed82b8a1ff76ed7b2709 renamed prio_to_weight to sched_prio_to_weight and prio_to_wmult to sched_prio_to_wmult, but the old names not updated in a comment.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 303d639..c5095b0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void __update_inv_weight(struct load_weight *lw) * OR * (delta_exec * (weight * lw->inv_weight)) >> WMULT_SHIFT * - * Either weight := NICE_0_LOAD and lw \e prio_to_wmult[], in which case + * Either weight := NICE_0_LOAD and lw \e sched_prio_to_wmult[], in which case * we're guaranteed shift stays positive because inv_weight is guaranteed to * fit 32 bits, and NICE_0_LOAD gives another 10 bits; therefore shift >= 22. * @@ -5630,7 +5630,7 @@ static bool yield_to_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preemp * W_i,0 = \Sum_j w_i,j (2) * * Where w_i,j is the weight of the j-th runnable task on cpu i. This weight - * is derived from the nice value as per prio_to_weight[]. + * is derived from the nice value as per sched_prio_to_weight[]. * * The weight average is an exponential decay average of the instantaneous * weight: -- 1.7.9.5
| |