lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tip tree
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > include/linux/irqdomain.h
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 29d5c8db26ad ("genirq: Add DOMAIN_BUS_IPI")
> >
> > from the tip tree and commit:
> >
> > 9b1b282ccd81 ("irqdomain: Added domain bus token DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI")
> >
> > from the staging tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > index ed48594e96d2,0934d06c8b00..000000000000
> > --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > @@@ -74,7 -74,7 +74,8 @@@ enum irq_domain_bus_token
> > DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI,
> > DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI,
> > DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS,
> > + DOMAIN_BUS_IPI,
> > + DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI,
>
> Errm. What's that? Did that DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI thingy get any review of the
> irq[domain] maintainers?

For some reason I thought it did, but in looking at the patch series, it
doesn't seem like that happened :(

The patch series started with this message id on lkml:
Message-ID: <1452117809-1870-1-git-send-email-German.Rivera@freescale.com>

German, any reason why you didn't cc: the irqdomain people on this
series?

Thomas, should I revert the series until you have a chance to ack it?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-02 19:21    [W:0.056 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site