lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v15 1/6] efi: ARM/arm64: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them
On Tue, 08 Mar, at 03:59:42PM, David Daney wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>
> There are two problems with the UEFI stub DT memory node removal
> routine:
> - it deletes nodes as it traverses the tree, which happens to work
> but is not supported, as deletion invalidates the node iterator;
> - deleting memory nodes entirely may discard annotations in the form
> of additional properties on the nodes.
>
> Since the discovery of DT memory nodes occurs strictly before the
> UEFI init sequence, we can simply clear the memblock memory table
> before parsing the UEFI memory map. This way, it is no longer
> necessary to remove the nodes, so we can remove that logic from the
> stub as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c | 24 +-----------------------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

I've not delved into the rest of the series too deeply, but this looks
like a straight forward change.

Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>

> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> index 9e15d57..40c9d85 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,14 @@ static __init void reserve_regions(void)
> if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
> pr_info("Processing EFI memory map:\n");
>
> + /*
> + * Discard memblocks discovered so far: if there are any at this
> + * point, they originate from memory nodes in the DT, and UEFI
> + * uses its own memory map instead.
> + */
> + memblock_dump_all();
> + memblock_remove(0, ULLONG_MAX);
> +
> for_each_efi_memory_desc(&memmap, md) {
> paddr = md->phys_addr;
> npages = md->num_pages;

Out of curiosity, could some kind person explain (or point me at a
previous explanation for) why we may have both DT memory nodes and a
UEFI memory map and why they're not compatible enough to co-exist?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-18 14:01    [W:0.094 / U:0.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site