Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:54:24 -0700 | From | Jeremy Allison <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4) |
| |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:02:13AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:05:16PM -0600, Steve French wrote: > >> Sounds like I need to quickly rework the SMB3 ACL helper functions > >> for cifs.ko > >> > >> Also do you know where is the current version of the corresponding > >> vfs_richacl for > >> Samba which works with the current RichACL format? > > > > I have a patch for a new vfs_richacl somewhere. I remember > > sending it to Andreas for testing... > > Ah, the patch was for testing, not resting ... how could I get that mixed up.
:-).
> I've applied your patch to the latest master branch, made it compile > again, and fixed a few obvious problems. The results I get with > smbcacls look reasonable now. > > The code is here: > https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/samba richacl > > I've used the following smb.conf: > [richacl] > comment = Richacl directory > path = /mnt/ext4 > vfs objects = richacl > writeable = yes > browseable = yes
Great ! Once richacls gets into the kernel I'll submit this into the Samba master branch.
> Is there a particular reason why you didn't make vfs_richacl a > dynamically loadable module?
Probably sheer lazyness :-).
| |