lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/4] media: pxa_camera: fix the buffer free path
Date
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi Robert,
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Robert,
>> >
>> > Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore
>> > these your patches were on hold?
>> They were reverted, and then revamped into DMA_CTRL_REUSE, upstreamed and
>> merged, as in the commit 272420214d26 ("dmaengine: Add DMA_CTRL_REUSE"). I'd
>>
>> Of course a pending fix is still underway
>> (http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,1318680). But that shouldn't stop us
>> from reviewing to get ready to merge.
>>
>> I want this serie to be ready, so that as soon as Vinod merges the fix, I can
>> ping you to trigger the merge into your tree, without doing (and waiting)
>> additional review cycles.
>
> Thanks, understand now. As we discussed before, correct me if I am wrong,
> this is your hobby project. PXA270 is a legacy platform, nobody except you
> is interested in this work. I have nothing against hobby projects and I
> want to support them as much as I can, but I hope you'll understand, that
> I don't have too much free time, so I cannot handle such projects with a
> high priority. I understand your desire to process these patches ASAP,
> however, I'd like to try to minimise my work too. So, I can propose the
> following: let us wait, until your PXA dmaengine patches are _indeed_ in
> the mainline. Then you test your camera patches on top of that tree again,
> perform any eventually necessary updates and either let me know, that
> either your last version is ok and I can now review it, or submit a new
> version, that _works_ on top of then current tree.

Okay Guennadi, I retested this version on top of v4.5-rc2, still good to
go. There is a minor conflict in the includes since this submission, and I can
repost a v6 which solves it.

So please tell me how I should proceed, either repost a rebased v6 or take v5 or
anything else ...

Cheers.

--
Robert

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-08 22:01    [W:0.092 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site