lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform
    On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 06:44:19PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
    > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:

    > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the
    > > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the specific arm-
    > > tree. But if you really want to take the whole series, for patches 4,5,6

    > Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't be
    > a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go thru
    > ARM tree.

    Not for the DT stuff - since the DT is supposed to be a stable ABI there
    really shouldn't be any hard dependencies on things outside the DT.

    > Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not
    > provided..

    It's the norm for DT stuff.
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-02-08 15:21    [W:2.772 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site