Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks | From | Steve Muckle <> | Date | Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:39:36 -0800 |
| |
Hi Rafael,
On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to > put this series into linux-next. > > There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for > bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on > this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so > there really isn't more time to wait.
Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and really just got to look at this today.
One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL task activity?
thanks, Steve
| |