lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25
Hello, Mike.

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:47:11PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> That very point is what makes it wrong for the workqueue code to ever
> target a work item. The instant it does target selection, correctness
> may be at stake, it doesn't know, thus it must assume the full onus,
> which it has neither the knowledge not the time to do. That's how we
> exploded on node = -1, trying to help out the user by doing his job,

I have a hard time seeing the NUMA_NO_NODE bug as something that
indicative of anything. It is a dumb bug from mm side which puts
everyone using cpu_to_node() at risk.

> but then not doing the whole job. IMHO, a better plan is to let the
> user screw it up all by himself.

What are you suggesting?

Thanks.

--
tejun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-05 22:21    [W:0.107 / U:5.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site