Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags | From | Eric Dumazet <> | Date | Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:54:37 -0800 |
| |
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 09:43 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Read the history. I still say it is best if we don't accept a partial > solution. If we are going to introduce the sysctl as a core item it > should function as a core item and not as something that belongs to > TCP only.
But this patch is the base, adding both the core sysctl and its first usage.
Do we really need to split it in 2 patches ? Really ?
The goal is to use it in all skb providers were it might be a performance gain, once they are identified.
Your points were already raised and will be addressed, by either me or you. And maybe others.
| |