lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM: Avoid false-positive warnings in dev_pm_domain_set()
From
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 30 January 2016 at 12:54, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>
>> There is a WARN_ON() in dev_pm_domain_set() that triggers on attempts
>> to set the pm_domain pointer for devices with a driver bound.
>>
>> However, that WARN_ON() triggers on attempts to clear the pointer
>> too and the test it uses is based on checking the device's
>> p->knode_driver pointer which still is set when the device bus
>> type's/driver's ->remove callback has been executed. This
>> leads to false-positive warnings when bus type code calls
>> dev_pm_domain_set() to clear the pm_domain pointer after
>> invoking the driver's ->remove() callback.
>>
>> To avoid those false-positives, make dev_pm_domain_set() check
>> if the pointer passed to it is NULL and skip the warning in
>> that case.
>>
>> Fixes: 989561de9b51 (PM / Domains: add setter for dev.pm_domain)
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/power/common.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/common.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/common.c
>> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/common.c
>> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void dev_pm_domain_set(struct device *de
>> if (dev->pm_domain == pd)
>> return;
>>
>> - WARN(device_is_bound(dev),
>> + WARN(pd && device_is_bound(dev),
>> "PM domains can only be changed for unbound devices\n");
>
> Perhaps this information then becomes a bit misleading, as it's okay
> to clear the pointer, but not assign it to a valid PM domain.

Well, this is a "you're doing a wrong thing" warning and it does say
what the wrong thing is. Does it have to be more specific? I don't
think so.

Thanks,
Rafael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-03 13:41    [W:0.060 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site