lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 02/13] arm-cci: fix handling cpumask_any_but return value
Date
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>

cpumask_any_but returns value >= nr_cpu_ids if there are no more CPUs.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
drivers/bus/arm-cci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index ee47e6b..5fb1c06 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static int cci_pmu_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cci_pmu->cpus))
break;
target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
- if (target < 0) // UP, last CPU
+ if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) // UP, last CPU
break;
/*
* TODO: migrate context once core races on event->ctx have
--
1.7.9.5
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-23 12:21    [W:0.109 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site