Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:05:45 +0900 | From | Sergey Senozhatsky <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/3] zram: use zs_get_huge_class_size_watermark() |
| |
On (02/22/16 13:54), Minchan Kim wrote: [..] > > well, at the same time zram must not dictate what to do. zram simply spoils > > zsmalloc; it does not offer guaranteed good compression, and it does not let > > zsmalloc to do it's job. zram has only excuses to be the way it is. > > the existing zram->zsmalloc dependency looks worse than zsmalloc->zram to me. > > I don't get it why you think it's zram->zsmalloc dependency.
clearly 'dependency' was simply a wrong word to use, 'enforcement' or 'policy' are better choices here. but you got my point.
-ss
| |