Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:31:33 +0100 | From | Philippe Loctaux <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: added lines after variable declarations |
| |
Hi, I'm really sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to mean. Could you simplify your sentence please (since I'm not english native)? I'd really apreciate that, thanks :)
-- Philippe Loctaux phil@philippeloctaux.com
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:06:03PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 01:01 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote: > > Is there no need of additional blank line here particulary > > or in all lines that I changed? > > Please don't top post and just here. > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 03:53:04PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 00:46 +0100, Philippe Loctaux wrote: > > > > Added lines after variable declarations, fixing 22 checkpatch warnings. > > > [] > > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > > > [] > > > > @@ -4592,6 +4610,7 @@ void btrfs_truncate_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path, > > > > data_end, old_data_start + new_size - data_end); > > > > } else { > > > > struct btrfs_disk_key disk_key; > > > > + > > > > u64 offset; > > > > > > Overzealous here. > > > No additional blank line required. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| |