lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver()
Date
The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332
("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering").

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e979ec7..bfefc91 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled);
* submitted by the CPU Frequency driver.
*
* Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code
- * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first
+ * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first
* (and isn't unregistered in the meantime).
*
*/
--
2.7.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-21 21:01    [W:0.031 / U:2.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site