lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[tip:mm/pkeys] x86/mm/pkeys: Add new 'PF_PK' page fault error code bit
Commit-ID:  b3ecd51559ae7a8f40b10443773b9cd0e6a50f5e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b3ecd51559ae7a8f40b10443773b9cd0e6a50f5e
Author: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:02:07 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:31:50 +0100

x86/mm/pkeys: Add new 'PF_PK' page fault error code bit

Note: "PK" is how the Intel SDM refers to this bit, so we also
use that nomenclature.

This only defines the bit, it does not plumb it anywhere to be
handled.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160212210207.DA7B43E6@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index eef44d9..9f72f9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
* bit 2 == 0: kernel-mode access 1: user-mode access
* bit 3 == 1: use of reserved bit detected
* bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch
+ * bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access
*/
enum x86_pf_error_code {

@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code {
PF_USER = 1 << 2,
PF_RSVD = 1 << 3,
PF_INSTR = 1 << 4,
+ PF_PK = 1 << 5,
};

/*
@@ -916,6 +918,12 @@ static int spurious_fault_check(unsigned long error_code, pte_t *pte)

if ((error_code & PF_INSTR) && !pte_exec(*pte))
return 0;
+ /*
+ * Note: We do not do lazy flushing on protection key
+ * changes, so no spurious fault will ever set PF_PK.
+ */
+ if ((error_code & PF_PK))
+ return 1;

return 1;
}
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-18 22:01    [W:0.435 / U:1.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site