lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review
    From
    Date
    On 02/17/2016 04:33 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
    > On 02/17/2016 04:26 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
    >>>>> Compiled, but didn't boot on my test system.
    >>>>> Unfortunately, I won't be able to debug this
    >>>>> until Wednesday.
    >>>>
    >>>> Were you able to figure this out?
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> I am working on bisect today. I should have something
    >>> for you later this afternoon.
    >>
    >> Just FWIW I have it running here in KVM with a simplified config, so it
    >> might be something related to a specific feature or driver but not
    >> necessarily in the core itself.
    >>
    >
    > git bisect tells me it is
    >
    > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    > remoteproc: avoid stack overflow in debugfs file
    >
    > This commit is also in 3.14.61-rc1 which worked just fine.
    > It is in 4.3.6-rc1 which does fail.
    >
    > I am building without it now to make sure it is the
    > offending commit
    >

    Sanity returns. Please remove the following commit:

    Ryan Ware <ware@linux.intel.com>
    EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest comparisons

    This commit can't stand on its own. crypto_memneq()
    isn't defined. With this change removed, it all works
    well.

    CC security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o^M
    security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c: In function â<80><98>evm_verify_hmacâ<80><99>:^M
    security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:132:3: error: implicit declaration of function â<80><98>crypto_memneqâ<80><99> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]^M
    rc = crypto_memneq(xattr_data->digest, calc.digest,^M
    ^^M
    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors^M
    make[3]: *** [security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o] Error 1^M
    make[2]: *** [security/integrity/evm] Error 2^M
    make[1]: *** [security/integrity] Error 2^M
    make: *** [security] Error 2^M

    I think I didn't run make clean and ended up with a
    bad install.

    thanks,
    -- Shuah



    --
    Shuah Khan
    Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
    Open Source Innovation Group
    Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
    shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-02-18 04:41    [W:2.679 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site