lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] powercap/rapl: reduce ipi calls
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:04:41 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> > > > if (topology_physical_package_id(i) ==
> > > > package_id)
> >
> > This is still crap. We really want a proper handling for that which
> > does not require these silly for_each_cpu() loops.
> >
> > That code already has a hotplug notifier, so you can track one online
> > cpu in the package like we do in cqm and other facilities.
> >
> > The first online cpu of a package sets itself as 'owner'. On unplug
> > it looks up:
> >
> > rpl->cpu = cpumask_any_but(topology_core_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
> >
> > So if this is the last cpu then rpl->cpu becomes nr_cpu_ids.
> >
> > So that whole nonsense can be avoided completely.
> ok, that would work nicely, similar to cqm_pick_event_reader().
> thanks for the tip. just fyi, unlike perf cqm, rapl runtime change is
> expected to be low frequency.

That still does not justify crap like this. And please use the version of pick
reader which I posted a couple of hours ago.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145572542221627&w=2

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-17 19:41    [W:0.039 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site