Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:02:09 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler |
| |
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:57:21AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:35:02AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If it's something that gets included in a generated document then people > > will tell you pretty quickly if it gets out of sync these days, 0day > > notices and there's people sending fixes quite frequently.
> Haven't generated docs turned out to be mostly pointless? I think it > makes a lot more sense to write comments so that they're more > accessible in-line.
I personally find very little value in them but there are definitely people who care about them judging by the patches I get when they go out of sync. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |