lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm: dts: AM57XX: Correct the thermal thresholds
From
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [160209 14:17]:
>> On 02/09/2016 04:09 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:15:05PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> >> The thermal threholds for am57xx are different from that of dra7.
>> >> Correcting the thresholds for the same.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Depends on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/8/90
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> Index: linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> --- linux.orig/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.514959101 +0530
>> >> +++ linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-beagle-x15.dts 2016-02-08 14:57:05.510959168 +0530
>> >
>> > Sorry, did not bother to check, but is this the only user of am57xx?
>>
>> we will have AM57xx-IDK as well coming down the line. we already have
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-cl-som-am57x.dts
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-sbc-am57x.dts - not really sure what grade of
>> silicon are used in cl-SOM and sbc boards.
>
> Hmm can this one wait for v4.6 or is it critical for v4.5-rc
> cycle?

personally, I'd like to NAK this patch -> lack of reference
documentation, and guidance for various AM57xx boards in a generic
patch should probably be followed IMHO.
---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-12 23:41    [W:0.105 / U:1.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site