lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 2/2] clk: qcom: Add support for RPM Clocks
On 12/15, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7b0e85eefe70
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
> +
> +static int clk_rpm_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_rpm *r = to_clk_rpm(hw);
> + unsigned long rate = r->rate;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rpm_clk_lock);
> +
> + if (!rate)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (r->branch)
> + rate = !!rate;
> +
> + ret = clk_rpm_set_rate_active(r, rate);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> +out:
> + if (!ret)
> + r->enabled = true;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&rpm_clk_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}

I don't see any "peer" code in this file. Is there a reason we're
leaving out the active only vs active + sleep set style clocks?

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-12 02:01    [W:0.076 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site