Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:41:26 -0800 | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clk: qcom: Add support for RPM Clocks |
| |
On 12/15, Georgi Djakov wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..7b0e85eefe70 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c > @@ -0,0 +1,290 @@ > + > +static int clk_rpm_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct clk_rpm *r = to_clk_rpm(hw); > + unsigned long rate = r->rate; > + int ret = 0; > + > + mutex_lock(&rpm_clk_lock); > + > + if (!rate) > + goto out; > + > + if (r->branch) > + rate = !!rate; > + > + ret = clk_rpm_set_rate_active(r, rate); > + > + if (ret) > + goto out; > + > +out: > + if (!ret) > + r->enabled = true; > + > + mutex_unlock(&rpm_clk_lock); > + > + return ret; > +}
I don't see any "peer" code in this file. Is there a reason we're leaving out the active only vs active + sleep set style clocks?
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |