lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V4 22/23] arm64, pci, acpi: Assign legacy IRQs once device is enable.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:58:53AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 06:29:00PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > This is the last step before enabling generic ACPI PCI host controller
> > for ARM64. We need to take care of legacy IRQ mapping for non-MSI(X)
> > PCI devices. pcibios_enable_device() boot order is not sensitive to
> > ACPI device enumeration, so it is the best place to assign device's IRQs.
>
> I guess you are referring to:
>
> https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-acpi/2015-October/005944.html
>
> It is weird that the dependency can't be enforced, I will have a look
> into this, it would be nice to have DT and ACPI legacy IRQs mapping
> confined in pcibios_add_device() so that we can remove them in one go
> when Matthew's series is merged.

One option, that is not ideal but has the merit of setting the stage
for pcibios_enable_device() AND pcibios_add_device() removal, is to add
IRQ mapping (by adding the call) in a pcibios_alloc_irq() callback (if
Bjorn does not remove it from core code before we manage to add it,
I think he is only reverting the x86 version).

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/9/648

That's called at device probe time, it should not change DT probing path
(unless we use the irq number before the device is probed, which I doubt)
and should allow the ACPI scan handlers to be installed so that the ACPI
IRQ mapping can be effectively carried out.

pcibios_alloc_irq() replaces pcibios_add_device().

When Matthew's patchset lands in mainline, pcibios_alloc_irq() will
be removed too (at least we have a place where all legacy IRQ mappings
are carried out and I can obliterate it easily).

Other option is to change ACPI core code, I see no other way.

Tested on KVM PCI host generic (that uses pci_fixup_irqs() so it does
not really count for DT).

Here (on top of your series), ready for flak.

Lorenzo

-- >8 --
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
index 0b53262..26ee291 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
@@ -45,28 +45,23 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
*/
int pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask)
{
- int ret;
-
if (pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))
return 0;

- ret = pci_enable_resources(dev, mask);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
- if (!pci_dev_msi_enabled(dev))
- return acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
-#endif
- return 0;
+ return pci_enable_resources(dev, mask);
}

/*
- * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
+ * Try to assign the IRQ number when probing a new device
*/
-int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
+int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
- dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
+ if (acpi_disabled)
+ dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ else
+ return acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
+#endif

return 0;
}
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-11 18:41    [W:0.100 / U:1.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site