lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Tearing down DMA transfer setup after DMA client has finished
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:42:31PM +0100, Mason wrote:
> On 06/12/2016 06:12, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Mason wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a way to write a driver within the existing framework?
> >
> > I think so, looking back at comments from Russell, I do tend to agree with
> > that. Is there a specific reason why sbox can't be tied to alloc and free
> > channels?
>
> Here's a recap of the situation.
>
> The "SBOX+MBUS" HW is used in several iterations of the tango SoC:

btw is SBOX setup dependent upon the peripheral connected to?

>
> tango3
> 2 memory channels available
> 6 devices ("clients"?) may request an MBUS channel

But only 2 can get a channel at any time..

>
> tango4 (one more channel)
> 3 memory channels available
> 7 devices may request an MBUS channel :
> NFC0, NFC1, SATA0, SATA1, memcpy, (IDE0, IDE1)

Same here

Only thing is users shouldn't hold on to channel and freeup when not in use.

> Notes:
> The current NFC driver supports only one controller.
> IDE is mostly obsolete at this point.
>
> tango5 (SATA gets own dedicated MBUS channel pair)
> 3 memory channels available
> 5 devices may request an MBUS channel :
> NFC0, NFC1, memcpy, (IDE0, IDE1)
>
>
> If I understand the current DMA driver (written by Mans), client
> drivers are instructed to use a specific channel in the DT, and
> the DMA driver muxes access to that channel. The DMA driver
> manages a per-channel queue of outstanding DMA transfer requests,
> and a new transfer is started friom within the DMA ISR
> (modulo the fact that the interrupt does not signal completion
> of the transfer, as explained else-thread).
>
> What you're proposing, Vinod, is to make a channel exclusive
> to a driver, as long as the driver has not explicitly released
> the channel, via dma_release_channel(), right?

Precisely, but yes the downside of that is concurrent access are limited, but
am not sure if driver implements virtual channels and allows that..

Thanks
--
~Vinod

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-07 17:35    [W:0.162 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site