lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET v4] blk-mq-scheduling framework
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 04:57:36PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make
> > blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it. From skimming over the patches, I
> > didn't see a solution to that problem.
>
> Hello Omar,
>
> Can you clarify your comment? Since my patches initialize both tags->rqs[]
> and sched_tags->rqs[] the function blk_mq_tag_to_rq() should still work.
>
> Bart.

Sorry, you're right, it does work, but tags->rqs[] ends up being the
extra lookup table. I suspect that the runtime overhead of keeping that
up to date could be worse than copying the rq fields if you have lots of
CPUs but only one hardware queue.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-22 18:13    [W:0.089 / U:5.920 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site