Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jeff Layton <> | Subject | [RFC PATCH v1 24/30] IMA: switch IMA over to new i_version API | Date | Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:03:41 -0500 |
| |
This change is straightforward, but I have some serious doubts about this code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index 9df26a2b75ba..1f676313c30b 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, } hash; if (!(iint->flags & IMA_COLLECTED)) { - u64 i_version = file_inode(file)->i_version; + u64 i_version = inode_get_iversion(file_inode(file)); if (file->f_flags & O_DIRECT) { audit_cause = "failed(directio)"; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 423d111b3b94..8d95cf42d20c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void ima_check_last_writer(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, inode_lock(inode); if (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1) { - if ((iint->version != inode->i_version) || + if (inode_cmp_iversion(inode, iint->version) || (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE)) { iint->flags &= ~(IMA_DONE_MASK | IMA_NEW_FILE); iint->measured_pcrs = 0; -- 2.7.4
| |