lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/memblock.c: trivial code refine in memblock_is_region_memory()
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:48:09AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Tue 20-12-16 16:35:40, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 04:15:14PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> >On Sun 18-12-16 14:47:49, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> The base address is already guaranteed to be in the region by
>> >> memblock_search().
>> >
>>
>> Hi, Michal
>>
>> Nice to receive your comment.
>>
>> >First of all the way how the check is removed is the worst possible...
>> >Apart from that it is really not clear to me why checking the base
>> >is not needed. You are mentioning memblock_search but what about other
>> >callers? adjust_range_page_size_mask e.g...
>> >
>>
>> Hmm... the memblock_search() is called by memblock_is_region_memory(). Maybe I
>> paste the whole function here would clarify the change.
>>
>> int __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>> {
>> int idx = memblock_search(&memblock.memory, base);
>> phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
>>
>> if (idx == -1)
>> return 0;
>> return memblock.memory.regions[idx].base <= base &&
>> (memblock.memory.regions[idx].base +
>> memblock.memory.regions[idx].size) >= end;
>> }
>
>Ohh, my bad. I thought that memblock_search is calling
>memblock_is_region_memory. I didn't notice this is other way around.
>Then I agree that the check for the base is not needed and can be
>removed.

Thanks~

I would feel honored if you would like to add Acked-by :-)

>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs

--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-21 13:44    [W:0.046 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site