lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCHv3] perf/x86/intel: Account interrupts for PEBS errors
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:41:04AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on tip/perf/core]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.9 next-20161215]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jiri-Olsa/perf-x86-intel-Account-interrupts-for-PEBS-errors/20161216-042644
> config: x86_64-randconfig-a0-12160640 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-4.4 (Debian 4.4.7-8) 4.4.7
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> kernel/events/core.c: In function '__perf_event_overflow':
> >> kernel/events/core.c:7086: warning: unused variable 'hwc'
> kernel/events/core.o: warning: objtool: perf_try_init_event()+0x43: function has unreachable instruction
>
> vim +/hwc +7086 kernel/events/core.c
>
> 7070 }
> 7071
> 7072 int perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event)
> 7073 {
> 7074 return __perf_event_account_interrupt(event, 1);
> 7075 }
> 7076
> 7077 /*
> 7078 * Generic event overflow handling, sampling.
> 7079 */
> 7080
> 7081 static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
> 7082 int throttle, struct perf_sample_data *data,
> 7083 struct pt_regs *regs)
> 7084 {
> 7085 int events = atomic_read(&event->event_limit);
> > 7086 struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> 7087 int ret = 0;
> 7088

ugh, I guess I'm too used to the perf tool to fail build on unused variable :-\

v3 attached

thanks,
jirka


---
It's possible to setup PEBS events and get only errors and not
a single data, like on SNB-X (model 45) and IVB-EP (model 62)
via 2 perf commands running simultaneously:

taskset -c 1 ./perf record -c 4 -e branches:pp -j any -C 10

This leads to soft lock up, because the error path of the
intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm does not account event->hw.interrupt
for error PEBS interrupts so the event is not eventually
stopped when it gets over the max_samples_per_tick limit.

NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#22 stuck for 22s! [perf_fuzzer:5816]
...
task: ffff880273148000 task.stack: ffffc90002d58000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81159232>] [<ffffffff81159232>] smp_call_function_single+0xe2/0x140
RSP: 0018:ffffc90002d5bd60 EFLAGS: 00000202
...
Call Trace:
? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf5/0x1b0
? perf_cgroup_attach+0x70/0x70
perf_install_in_context+0x199/0x1b0
? ctx_resched+0x90/0x90
SYSC_perf_event_open+0x641/0xf90
SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0x10
do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x1f0
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

Adding perf_event_account_interrupt with event's interrupt
and frequency checks and calling it from drain_pebs's error
path.

Keeping pending_kill and pending_wakeup check up logic only
in __perf_event_overflow path, because they make sense only
in case if there's any data to deliver.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 6 +++++-
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
kernel/events/core.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index be202390bbd3..9dfeeeca0ea8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -1389,9 +1389,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
continue;

/* log dropped samples number */
- if (error[bit])
+ if (error[bit]) {
perf_log_lost_samples(event, error[bit]);

+ if (perf_event_account_interrupt(event))
+ x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
+ }
+
if (counts[bit]) {
__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, base,
top, bit, counts[bit]);
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 4741ecdb9817..78ed8105e64d 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1259,6 +1259,7 @@ extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_disable_local(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event);
extern void perf_event_task_tick(void);
+extern int perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event);
#else /* !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS: */
static inline void *
perf_aux_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 02c8421f8c01..bb24d5abc40a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7034,25 +7034,11 @@ static void perf_log_itrace_start(struct perf_event *event)
perf_output_end(&handle);
}

-/*
- * Generic event overflow handling, sampling.
- */
-
-static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
- int throttle, struct perf_sample_data *data,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int __perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event, int throttle)
{
- int events = atomic_read(&event->event_limit);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
- u64 seq;
int ret = 0;
-
- /*
- * Non-sampling counters might still use the PMI to fold short
- * hardware counters, ignore those.
- */
- if (unlikely(!is_sampling_event(event)))
- return 0;
+ u64 seq;

seq = __this_cpu_read(perf_throttled_seq);
if (seq != hwc->interrupts_seq) {
@@ -7080,6 +7066,34 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
perf_adjust_period(event, delta, hwc->last_period, true);
}

+ return ret;
+}
+
+int perf_event_account_interrupt(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return __perf_event_account_interrupt(event, 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Generic event overflow handling, sampling.
+ */
+
+static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
+ int throttle, struct perf_sample_data *data,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ int events = atomic_read(&event->event_limit);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Non-sampling counters might still use the PMI to fold short
+ * hardware counters, ignore those.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!is_sampling_event(event)))
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = __perf_event_account_interrupt(event, throttle);
+
/*
* XXX event_limit might not quite work as expected on inherited
* events
--
2.7.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-16 09:09    [W:0.080 / U:1.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site