Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: remove unused device definitions | From | Marc Kleine-Budde <> | Date | Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:28:48 +0100 |
| |
On 12/16/2016 10:23 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, December 16, 2016 10:10:49 AM CET Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 12/16/2016 10:05 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> I stumbled over these during build testing, they are evidently >>> not referenced anywhere any more. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c | 9 --------- >>> arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 10 ---------- >>> 2 files changed, 19 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c >>> index 55d61eaf63c6..8a1a2fc4ce10 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c >>> @@ -19,15 +19,6 @@ >>> #define imx_flexcan_data_entry(soc, _id, _hwid, _size) \ >>> [_id] = imx_flexcan_data_entry_single(soc, _id, _hwid, _size) >>> >>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_IMX25 >>> -const struct imx_flexcan_data imx25_flexcan_data[] __initconst = { >>> -#define imx25_flexcan_data_entry(_id, _hwid) \ >>> - imx_flexcan_data_entry(MX25, _id, _hwid, SZ_16K) >>> - imx25_flexcan_data_entry(0, 1), >>> - imx25_flexcan_data_entry(1, 2), >>> -}; >>> -#endif /* ifdef CONFIG_SOC_IMX25 */ >>> - >>> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_IMX35 >>> const struct imx_flexcan_data imx35_flexcan_data[] __initconst = { >>> #define imx35_flexcan_data_entry(_id, _hwid) \ >> >> What about the imx35 variant? >> > > It's used from here: > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm043.c: imx35_add_flexcan1();
Yes, you're right. Sorry, I searched before my 2nd tee.
Marc
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |