lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] drm/mxsfb: use bus_format to determine LCD bus width
From
Date
On 12/14/2016 09:51 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 2016-12-13 23:52, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 12/14/2016 02:02 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>> The LCD bus width does not need to align with the pixel format. The
>>> LCDIF controller automatically converts between pixel formats and
>>> bus width by padding or dropping LSBs.
>>>
>>> The DRM subsystem has the notion of bus_format which allows to
>>> determine what bus_formats are supported by the display. Choose the
>>> first available or fallback to 24 bit if none are available.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
>>
>> Minor nits below.
>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Use seperate function mxsfb_set_bus_fmt
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_crtc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_regs.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_crtc.c
>>> index 4bcc8a3..956769b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_crtc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_crtc.c
>>> @@ -65,13 +65,11 @@ static int mxsfb_set_pixel_fmt(struct mxsfb_drm_private *mxsfb)
>>> switch (format) {
>>> case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
>>> dev_dbg(drm->dev, "Setting up RGB565 mode\n");
>>> - ctrl |= CTRL_SET_BUS_WIDTH(STMLCDIF_16BIT);
>>> ctrl |= CTRL_SET_WORD_LENGTH(0);
>>> ctrl1 |= CTRL1_SET_BYTE_PACKAGING(0xf);
>>> break;
>>> case DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888:
>>> dev_dbg(drm->dev, "Setting up XRGB8888 mode\n");
>>> - ctrl |= CTRL_SET_BUS_WIDTH(STMLCDIF_24BIT);
>>> ctrl |= CTRL_SET_WORD_LENGTH(3);
>>> /* Do not use packed pixels = one pixel per word instead. */
>>> ctrl1 |= CTRL1_SET_BYTE_PACKAGING(0x7);
>>> @@ -87,6 +85,35 @@ static int mxsfb_set_pixel_fmt(struct mxsfb_drm_private *mxsfb)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void mxsfb_set_bus_fmt(struct mxsfb_drm_private *mxsfb)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &mxsfb->pipe.crtc;
>>> + struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
>>> + u32 bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24;
>>> + u32 reg;
>> ^^^ this is uninitialized
>>
>>> + writel(CTRL_BUS_WIDTH_MASK, mxsfb->base + LCDC_CTRL + REG_CLR);
>>> +
>>> + if (mxsfb->connector.display_info.num_bus_formats)
>>> + bus_format = mxsfb->connector.display_info.bus_formats[0];
>>> +
>>> + switch (bus_format) {
>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_1X16:
>>> + reg |= CTRL_SET_BUS_WIDTH(STMLCDIF_16BIT);
>> ^^^
>> here you're doing operation on uninited value.
>>
>>> + break;
>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X18:
>>> + reg |= CTRL_SET_BUS_WIDTH(STMLCDIF_18BIT);
>>> + break;
>>> + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24:
>>> + reg |= CTRL_SET_BUS_WIDTH(STMLCDIF_24BIT);
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + dev_err(drm->dev, "Unknown media bus format %d\n", bus_format);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + writel(reg, mxsfb->base + LCDC_CTRL + REG_SET);
>>
>> What I was thinking might be better is to save the calculated LCD_CRTC
>> value in mxsfb_drm_private , but maybe R-M-W is good enough after all?
>
> Yeah I see what you are saying, however I would prefer to not cache if
> there is no real reason to...

OK

> It is now a write to the clear and one write to the set variant of the
> register, not sure if that counts as "two writes".

It's two writel() calls, it does.

>> Two writes are IMO not great because it unnecessarily reconfigures the
>> controller twice.
>
> Does that matter? At this point, the RUN bit is guaranteed not to be
> set...

It's probably a matter of taste, although I'd be more comfortable with
RMW here.

--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-14 22:29    [W:0.035 / U:1.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site