Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:54:54 +0000 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] spi-nor: Add support for Intel SPI serial flash controller |
| |
On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 01:25 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 08:57:53AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > >> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > >>> On 12/07/2016 09:53 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:45:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>>> I'm happy either way. However if you take them, I will require a > >>>>> pull-request to an immutable branch containing only these patches. > >>>>> > >>>>> If I take them, it won't be until v4.11, since we are half way though > >>>>> -rc8 already and I would like them to soak in -next for at least a > >>>>> couple of weeks. > >>>> > >>>> This series already missed v4.8 and v4.9 so I don't think there is a > >>>> rush to get it for v4.10 either ;-) I'm fine if it goes for v4.11. > >>> > >>> Hmmmmmmmmmmm, that kinda sucks. Lee, are you positive this isn't 4.10 > >>> material ? > >> > >> The merge-window opens in 2 days. > >> > >> As I mentioned, I like patches to reside in -next for at least 1 maybe > >> 2 RC cycles before merging. It's far to easy to accept code, then get > >> bitten if/when it breaks after being merged by Linus. > > > > I agree. Better to give it some time in linux-next. > > > > Can you queue this series for v4.11? > > OK, I'm fine with this.
Yes, no problem.
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
| |