lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] nvme-fabrics: correct some printk information
From
Date
On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 00:07 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:54:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > diff -u -p drivers//dma/pxa_dma.c /tmp/nothing//dma/pxa_dma.c
> > --- drivers//dma/pxa_dma.c
> > +++ /tmp/nothing//dma/pxa_dma.c
> > @@ -640,9 +640,6 @@ static unsigned int clear_chan_irq(struc
> > dcsr = phy_readl_relaxed(phy, DCSR);
> > phy_writel(phy, dcsr, DCSR);
> > if ((dcsr & PXA_DCSR_BUSERR) && (phy->vchan))
> > - dev_warn(&phy->vchan->vc.chan.dev->device,
> > - "%s(chan=%p): PXA_DCSR_BUSERR\n",
> > - __func__, &phy->vchan);
>
> That's not a defect. We're getting the address of vchan. I don't get
> it?

$ git grep -n -w vchan drivers/dma/pxa*
drivers/dma/pxa_dma.c:103: struct pxad_chan *vchan;

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-10 23:24    [W:0.053 / U:19.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site