lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: task isolation discussion at Linux Plumbers
From
Date
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 19:16 +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 02:12:13PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 19:36 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > == Missing oneshot_stopped callbacks ==
> > > > >
> > > > > I raised the issue that various clock_event_device sources
> > > > > don't
> > > > > always support oneshot_stopped, which can cause an additional
> > > > > final interrupt to occur after the timer infrastructure
> > > > > believes
> > > > > the
> > > > > interrupt has been stopped.  I have patches to fix this for
> > > > > tile
> > > > > and
> > > > > arm64 in my patch series; Thomas volunteered to look at
> > > > > adding
> > > > > equivalent support for x86.
> > > >
> > > > Right.
> > >
> > > Untested patch below should fix that.
> > >  
> >
> > That whitespace cleanup looks awesome, but I am not
> > optimistic about its chances to bring about functional
> > change.
> >
> > What am I overlooking?
>
> It hooks up .set_state_oneshot_stopped?

Gah, indeed. Never mind :)

--
All Rights Reversed.[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-07 20:19    [W:1.930 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site