lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] USB: OHCI: use module_platform_driver macro
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:49:22PM +0000, csmanjuvijay@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Manjunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
>
> Use the module_platform_driver macro to do module init/exit.
> This eliminates a lot of boilerplate.This also removes
> checkpatch.pl errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
> Cc: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ohci-nxp.c | 38 ++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-nxp.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-nxp.c
> index b7d4756..9908647 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-nxp.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-nxp.c
> @@ -56,8 +56,6 @@ static struct hc_driver __read_mostly ohci_nxp_hc_driver;
>
> static struct i2c_client *isp1301_i2c_client;
>
> -extern int usb_disabled(void);
> -
> static struct clk *usb_host_clk;
>
> static void isp1301_configure_lpc32xx(void)
> @@ -127,6 +125,7 @@ static inline void isp1301_vbus_off(void)
> static void ohci_nxp_start_hc(void)
> {
> unsigned long tmp = __raw_readl(USB_OTG_STAT_CONTROL) | HOST_EN;
> +
> __raw_writel(tmp, USB_OTG_STAT_CONTROL);
> isp1301_vbus_on();
> }
> @@ -134,6 +133,7 @@ static void ohci_nxp_start_hc(void)
> static void ohci_nxp_stop_hc(void)
> {
> unsigned long tmp;
> +
> isp1301_vbus_off();
> tmp = __raw_readl(USB_OTG_STAT_CONTROL) & ~HOST_EN;
> __raw_writel(tmp, USB_OTG_STAT_CONTROL);

Why make these last two changes? They are just coding style "fixups"
that have nothing to do with this patch :(

When you say "also" in a patch description, that's a huge flag that you
should be splitting the patch up into multiple patches. Please do so
here.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-29 15:04    [W:0.055 / U:2.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site