lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCHv4 3/6] printk: introduce per-cpu safe_print seq buffer
On Fri 2016-10-28 00:49:30, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> This patch extends the idea of NMI per-cpu buffers to regions
> that may cause recursive printk() calls and possible deadlocks.
> Namely, printk() can't handle printk calls from schedule code
> or printk() calls from lock debugging code (spin_dump() for instance);
> because those may be called with `sem->lock' already taken or any
> other `critical' locks (p->pi_lock, etc.). An example of deadlock
> can be
>
> vprintk_emit()
> console_unlock()
> up() << raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
> wake_up_process()
> try_to_wake_up()
> ttwu_queue()
> ttwu_activate()
> activate_task()
> enqueue_task()
> enqueue_task_fair()
> cfs_rq_of()
> task_of()
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!entity_is_task(se))
> vprintk_emit()
> console_trylock()
> down_trylock()
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags)
> ^^^^ deadlock
>
> and some other cases.
>
> Just like in NMI implementation, the solution uses a per-cpu
> `printk_func' pointer to 'redirect' printk() calls to a 'safe'
> callback, that store messages in a per-cpu buffer and flushes
> them back to logbuf buffer later.
>
> Usage example:
>
> printk()
> printk_safe_enter(flags)
> //
> // any printk() call from here will endup in vprintk_safe(),
> // that stores messages in a special per-CPU buffer.
> //
> printk_safe_exit(flags)
>
> The 'redirection' mechanism, though, has been reworked, as suggested
> by Petr Mladek. Instead of using a per-cpu @print_func callback we now
> keep a per-cpu printk-context variable and call either default or nmi
> vprintk function depending on its value. printk_nmi_entrer/exit and
> printk_safe_enter/exit, thus, just set/celar corresponding bits in
> printk-context functions.
>
> The patch only adds printk_safe support, we don't use it yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>

> diff --git a/kernel/printk/internal.h b/kernel/printk/internal.h
> index 7fd2838..87c784b 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/printk/internal.h
> #endif /* CONFIG_PRINTK_NMI */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
> +
> +#define PRINTK_SAFE_CONTEXT_MASK 0x7fffffff
> +#define PRINTK_SAFE_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK 0x80000000

What about shorter name PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK?

> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> index 1f66163..af74d9c 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
> @@ -50,27 +49,26 @@ struct printk_safe_seq_buf {
> struct irq_work work; /* IRQ work that flushes the buffer */
> unsigned char buffer[SAFE_LOG_BUF_LEN];
> };
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct printk_safe_seq_buf, safe_print_seq);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, printk_safe_context);

I would personally use the short name "printk_context". It is a generic
value. Zero value means that it is a normal context. Also there is
an idea to add KDB context that would use its own vprintk_kdb()
implementation and will not use the printk_safe buffer.


> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK_NMI
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct printk_safe_seq_buf, nmi_print_seq);
> +atomic_t nmi_message_lost;
> +#endif
>
> -/*
> - * Safe printk() for NMI context. It uses a per-CPU buffer to
> - * store the message. NMIs are not nested, so there is always only
> - * one writer running. But the buffer might get flushed from another
> - * CPU, so we need to be careful.
> - */
> -static int vprintk_safe_nmi(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +static int printk_safe_log_store(struct printk_safe_seq_buf *s,
> + const char *fmt, va_list args)
> {
> - struct printk_safe_seq_buf *s = this_cpu_ptr(&nmi_print_seq);
> - int add = 0;
> + int add;
> size_t len;
>
> again:
> len = atomic_read(&s->len);
>
> - if (len >= sizeof(s->buffer)) {
> - atomic_inc(&nmi_message_lost);
> - return 0;
> - }
> + if (len >= sizeof(s->buffer))
> + return -E2BIG;

E2BIG means "argument list too long" and does not fit much here.
I would suggest to use -ENOSPC. It is not ideal either but it fits
slightly better.

> +/*
> + * Lockless printk(), to avoid deadlocks should the printk() recurse
> + * into itself. It uses a per-CPU buffer to store the message, just like
> + * NMI.
> + */
> +static int vprintk_safe(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +{
> + struct printk_safe_seq_buf *s = this_cpu_ptr(&safe_print_seq);
> +
> + return printk_safe_log_store(s, fmt, args);

We should return zero if printk_safe_log_store() returns an error.
I know that it will get fixed in the next patch. But we should do
some minimum sanity check here because of bisection.


Best Regards,
Petr

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-24 17:58    [W:0.223 / U:0.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site