lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: many "changed bandwidth, new config is" messages in the log
On Thu 24-11-16 16:12:14, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 15:07 +0000, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > I have only now managed to move to 4.9-rc5 (from 4.8) and started
> > seeing quite a lot of following messages
> > "
> > [  346.612211] wlan0: AP c0:4a:00:f1:48:f2 changed bandwidth, new
> > config is 2472 MHz, width 1 (2472/0 MHz)
> > [  352.655929] wlan0: AP c0:4a:00:f1:48:f2 changed bandwidth, new
> > config is 2472 MHz, width 2 (2462/0 MHz)
> > "
>
> I don't think these messages are new in any way. checking ... nope,
> it's been around that way since 3.9 :-)

Right you are. I must have missed them before and git grep + git blame
fooled me.

> > It always seems to be changing width from 1 -> 2 and back
>
> Makes sense, that's 20 MHz <-> 40 MHz.
>
> Did you buy a new device that says it's 40 MHz incompatible or
> something?

I am using this device for years now. It is a cheap TP-Link home
wireless router. So hard to tell about above. I am far from an expert.

> Or perhaps one of your neighbors did ... Or something is
> causing interference that makes the AP switch around.

This might be possible. There are quite some devices broadcasting around
$ sudo iwlist wlan0 scan | grep "Channel:" | sort | uniq -c
6 Channel:1
6 Channel:11
1 Channel:112
2 Channel:13
2 Channel:3
7 Channel:6
1 Channel:9

my router is at channel 13 so there seems to be something else sitting
there as well.

> > $ dmesg | grep "changed bandwidth" | wc -l
> > 42
> > in 13 minutes of uptime. I have noticed this came in via 30eb1dc2c430
> > ("mac80211: properly track HT/VHT operation changes").
>
> Right, but that went into 3.9 :-)
>
> > Is this something to be worried about?
>
> Not at all. I suppose we could make this a debug message though, it's
> not super useful when it happens OK (sometimes it causes disconnections
> when we can't support the new mode, which is more relevant).

OK, I see. Then I would suggest lowering the loglevel ;)

Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-24 16:26    [W:0.154 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site