lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: perf: fuzzer KASAN unwind_get_return_address
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:43:56PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
>>
>> Running on my haswell machine with the imc/uncore patch applied, the
>> perf_fuzzer next tripped over this issue.
>>
>> [ 202.034495] BAD LUCK: lost 371 message(s) from NMI context!
>> [ 202.034496] ==================================================================
>> [ 202.048327] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in unwind_get_return_address+0x35/0x80 at addr ffff8800cff0bd90
>> [ 202.058826] Read of size 8 by task perf_fuzzer/16254
>> [ 202.064186] page:ffffea00033fc2c0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0^Ac
>> [ 202.073068] flags: 0x1ffff8000000400(reserved)
>> [ 202.077885] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>> [ 202.083880] CPU: 4 PID: 16254 Comm: perf_fuzzer Not tainted 4.9.0-rc5+ #5
>> [ 202.091204] Hardware name: LENOVO 10AM000AUS/SHARKBAY, BIOS FBKT72AUS 01/26/2014
>> [ 202.099181] ffff8800cff0b1d8^Ac ffffffff816bb796^Ac ffff8800cff0b270^Ac ffff8800cff0bd90^Ac
>> [ 202.107896] ffff8800cff0b260^Ac ffffffff812fbe95^Ac 00007ffc9d1ab480^Ac 0000000000000000^Ac
>> [ 202.116638] ffffffff8125117d^Ac 0000000000000092^Ac 0000000000000000^Ac ffff8800cff0b7c0^Ac
>> [ 202.125339] Call Trace:
>> [ 202.127994] <NMI> [<ffffffff816bb796>] dump_stack+0x63/0x8d
>> [ 202.134184] [<ffffffff812fbe95>] kasan_report_error+0x495/0x4c0
>> [ 202.140680] [<ffffffff8125117d>] ? perf_output_begin+0x28d/0x4c0
>> [ 202.147228] [<ffffffff812fc319>] kasan_report+0x39/0x40
>> [ 202.152987] [<ffffffff81095ce5>] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x35/0x80
>> [ 202.160094] [<ffffffff812fa8fe>] __asan_load8+0x5e/0x70
>> [ 202.165859] [<ffffffff81095ce5>] unwind_get_return_address+0x35/0x80
>
> Josh, any ideas?

I think this is a false positive due to imprecise unwind that hits a
stack redzone.
We probably need to use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK as in get_wchan.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-15 20:05    [W:1.946 / U:0.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site