Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] Block fixes for 4.9-rc | From | Jens Axboe <> | Date | Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:24:31 -0700 |
| |
On 11/11/2016 05:45 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> Three small (really, one liners all of them!) fixes that should go into >> this series: > > What about the aoeblk one? That seems to have come in with a tester > lately. From your original email: > > "I'm wondering if this is bio iteration breakage. aoeblk does this weird > inc/dec of page counts, which should not be needed. At least others > would be hit by this as well. In any case, should suffice for a test, > before we look further. Can anyone test with this debug patch?" > > Anyway, that bug seems to have been around forever and I'm not seeing > a lot of complaints, but I thought I'd ask.
I was going to queue that one up for 4.10, but we can go with 4.9 as well. I don't think it's a huge deal. And, as per the below, looks like I'm sending another round next week anyway.
> Your oneliners pulled. Except when I pull, I don't actually get this one: > > Matias Bjørling (1): > lightnvm: invalid offset calculation for lba_shift > > but since you know how very deeply I care about lighnvm, I'm not > finding it in myself to worry about why that one was missing.
Yes, I remember you made that clear :-)
I forgot to push that one out after applying the other day, apparently, and missed that git request-pull complained. But worry not, I'll include that in the next round. It's still a merge window regression.
-- Jens Axboe
| |