Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Staging: fsl-mc: include: mc-bus: Kernel type 's16' preferred over 'int16_t' | From | Shiva Kerdel <> | Date | Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:33:10 +0100 |
| |
Sorry for this misunderstanding,
Since received a response from Stuart on my previous patch telling me I was probably working on a out-of-date codebase, I started to look where I did go wrong.
After some research I found out that I was always one step behind because I was developing on the actual Linux kernel branch instead of using the Staging-next as my codebase.
He wrote me to sent the patches that still apply over again with a new version tag so that's why this patch only contains 2 of them.
I am still new at contributing to the Linux kernel and some things were not really clear to me at the beginning. I hope that you could still use these patches and I am trying to avoid misunderstandings like these.
Do I still need to resend them and is there anything left for me to do with these?
Best regards,
Shiva Kerdel
On 11/10/16 13:24, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Shiva Kerdel wrote: >> Follow the kernel type preferrences of using 's16' over 'int16_t'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shiva Kerdel <shiva@exdev.nl> >> --- >> drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc-bus.h | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > What is different from your v1 patch? > > I'm confused now, I have two different series from you, one 6 patches > long, and one 2 patches long, claiming to do the same thing. > > I've dropped them both from my patch review queue and please, resend > what you really want me to apply :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h
| |