lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: crypto/aes-ce-ccm: Cleanup hwcap check
From
Date
On 01/11/16 14:03, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hi Suzuki,
>
> On 31 October 2016 at 16:03, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> wrote:
>> Use the module_cpu_feature_match to make sure the system has
>> HWCAP_AES to use the module.
>>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-ccm-glue.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-ccm-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-ccm-glue.c
>> index f4bf2f2..fa82eaa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-ccm-glue.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-ccm-glue.c
...
>> -module_init(aes_mod_init);
>> +module_cpu_feature_match(AES, aes_mod_init);
>
> I don't think this change is correct. This will result in the AES
> instruction dependency to be exposed via the module alias, causing the
> module to be loaded automatically as soon as udev detects that the CPU
> implements those instructions. For plain AES, that makes sense, but
> AES in CCM mode is specific to CCMP (WPA2) on mac80211 controllers
> that have no hardware AES support, and to IPsec VPN. For this reason,
> the algo type is exposed via the module alias instead (i.e,
> 'ccm(aes)'), which will result in the module being loaded as soon as
> the crypto algo manager instantiates the transform. On CPUs that don't
> implement the AES instructions, this will fail, and it will fall back
> to the generic CCM driver instead.

Ah, thanks for the explanation. I will drop it.

Cheers
Suzuki

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-01 15:19    [W:3.564 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site