lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not decay new task load on first enqueue
2016-09-29 3:37 GMT+08:00 Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>:
> On Wed, 28 Sep, at 12:14:22PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> Which suggests we do something like the below (not compile tested or
>> anything, also I ran out of tea again).
>
> I'm away on FTO right now. I can test this when I return on Friday.
>
> Funnily enough, I now remember that I already sent a fix for the
> missing update_rq_clock() in post_init_entity_util_avg(), but didn't
> apply it when chasing this hackbench regression (oops),
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-3-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk

The difference between this patch and Peterz's is your patch have a
delta since activate_task()->enqueue_task() does do update_rq_clock(),
so why don't have the delta will cause low cpu machines (4 or 8) to
regress against your another reply in this thread?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-09 05:40    [W:0.188 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site