Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 7 Oct 2016 02:46:50 -0700 | From | tip-bot for Rik van Riel <> | Subject | [tip:x86/fpu] x86/fpu: Remove __fpregs_(de)activate() |
| |
Commit-ID: 66f314efca3843a8874405ab015e354d041f86dd Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/66f314efca3843a8874405ab015e354d041f86dd Author: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> AuthorDate: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 20:34:37 -0400 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:14:42 +0200
x86/fpu: Remove __fpregs_(de)activate()
Now that fpregs_activate() and fpregs_deactivate() do nothing except call the double underscored versions of themselves, we can get rid of the double underscore version.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1475627678-20788-9-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 25 +++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h index d2cfe16..d0324bc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h @@ -509,8 +509,11 @@ static inline int fpregs_state_valid(struct fpu *fpu, unsigned int cpu) return fpu == this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx) && cpu == fpu->last_cpu; } - -static inline void __fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) +/* + * These generally need preemption protection to work, + * do try to avoid using these on their own: + */ +static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) { WARN_ON_FPU(!fpu->fpregs_active); @@ -519,7 +522,7 @@ static inline void __fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) trace_x86_fpu_regs_deactivated(fpu); } -static inline void __fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu) +static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu) { WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active); @@ -544,20 +547,6 @@ static inline int fpregs_active(void) } /* - * These generally need preemption protection to work, - * do try to avoid using these on their own. - */ -static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu) -{ - __fpregs_activate(fpu); -} - -static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) -{ - __fpregs_deactivate(fpu); -} - -/* * FPU state switching for scheduling. * * This is a two-stage process: @@ -595,7 +584,7 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct fpu *new_fpu, int cpu) /* Don't change CR0.TS if we just switch! */ if (fpu.preload) { - __fpregs_activate(new_fpu); + fpregs_activate(new_fpu); trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(new_fpu); prefetch(&new_fpu->state); }
| |