Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH 52/54] md/raid10: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_puts() in raid10_status() | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:52:03 +0200 |
| |
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:41:09 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index 82d79f5..554b6d2 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ static void raid10_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev) seq_printf(seq, "%s", rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_"); } rcu_read_unlock(); - seq_printf(seq, "]"); + seq_puts(seq, "]"); } /* check if there are enough drives for -- 2.10.1
| |